Welcome to Office Zealot Sign in | Join | Help

Blog Sponsored By:



Syndication

Tags

    No tags have been created or used yet.
Gender-Free Language

Are you in a quandary about political correctness? Do you feel silly when faced with he, she, it, and they, he or she, or even s/he? Writing without gender doesn't have to be uncomfortable, and perhaps you don't have to be as diligent about gender free language as you feared.

It used to be that the default type of person to which you could refer in your writing was a he. Then the Women's Movement happened in the 60s, and it was considered hateful to default to he, so the tide went the other way with swarms of she buzzing around everywhere.

The truth is, in today's written language, there aren't very many situations in which you might only find members of one gender or another. Some people are very uptight about the whole situation and edit it out as best they can, defaulting to their own gender or the opposite when they can't edit it out. Some people solve the problem by writing to “you.” Other people feel that the women's situation here in the early twenty-first century is fairly stable, and don't have a problem defaulting to he, rather than getting all tangled up in editing it out.

Let's play with it a little bit, and see how you feel about it.

The user slowly tore the edge off the paper.
He slowly tore the edge off the paper.
She slowly tore the edge off the paper.
They slowly tore the edges off the papers.

The first and last of the set are gender free. Is there anything awkward about these sentences? I don't think so. But they are certainly more distant from their subjects than the middle two. Let's look at a harder set.

The student took a bus on her field trip.
The student took a bus on his field trip.
The student took a bus on the field trip.
The student took a bus on a field trip.

As you can see, gender is easily edited out. It doesn't make much difference to the meaning, unless the gender of the student is important.

Let's get two people in the sentence and see what happens.

The instructor told him to open the files.
The instructor told us to open the files.
The instructor told the class to open the files.
The instructor told the students to open the files.

As you can see, only the first sentence involves gender. The rest are neutral; maybe you noticed how easy it is to insert “the” or “a” and a nice noun into a sentence to get past this little hurdle.

The authorization level is based on what the user has entered as ________ password.

What would you do here, one of my readers asks? There's the old standby of “his,” there's the new-fangled his/her, there's the deeply waffling and technically wrong “their,” and there's the nice simple “a.” My choice is the latter, because it doesn't call attention to anything. Or you could try another way or three:

The authorization level is based on the user's password.
The authorization level is based on the user's password choice.
The authorization level is based on your password.

Gender doesn't need to be a big issue. Just be consistent within the piece and most likely, no one will notice anything about gender at all.

You can find these blogs, a little information about my editorial services and me, and a collection of pages about my “real” life on my  Web site, www.MelanieSpiller.com.

Published Saturday, April 10, 2004 8:52 AM by spiller

Comments

# @ Saturday, April 10, 2004 10:52 AM

>technically wrong ?their,? True perhaps from a logical POV, but the use of "their" as a gender-free pronoun with a singular antecedent goes back a long way in English. This is from an article in "The Vocabula Review," a publication that definitely leans toward the prescriptive side of things: "Speakers of English, on the other hand, have been using singular they since the days of Middle English. And writers ? even those most glorified in English literature ? used the term long before grammarians decided to stuff our brawny English corpus into a tight Latinate corset." The author refers to the use of "their" in this context as "a revival, not an innovation." They also note that "their" is overwhelmingly used in speech this way. FWIW, MSTP, our styleguide at work, does allow the use of "their" with a singular antecedent. Who'd a thunk? :-)

Anonymous

# @ Tuesday, April 13, 2004 5:07 AM

How about Spivak pronouns? http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Spivak%20pronoun It?s fun, but will it catch on? I doubt it.

Anonymous

Anonymous comments are disabled