Welcome to Office Zealot Sign in | Join | Help

Blog Sponsored By:



Syndication

Tags

    No tags have been created or used yet.
Who Versus Whom

A friend asked me today to tell him when to use “who” and when to use “whom.” It's simple: it depends in which part of the sentence you need to put it. Use “who” when it's in the “subject” and “whom” when it's in the predicate (after the verb, or the object on which the verb acts).

Here's a nice trick. Use the word “he” and see what happens.

He needs the book.

Substitute “who” for “he” and you get:

Who needs the book?

Now move the “he” to the other side of the verb, and conjugate accordingly. Look at another one.

Albert told him about the cat.

Then switch “whom” for “him.“

Albert told whom about the cat?

You can see that the nice little “m” on the end of the “him” is your clue that you need one for “whom” too. Look at these.

He sings the song softly.
Who sings the song softly?
The judge believed him innocent
The judge believed whom innocent?

It's easy, right? You can use this same substitution for plural, too, you just have to remember to change the verb accordingly.

The people are here. (He is here.)
Who is here?
You brought soup for these people? (You brought soup for him.)
You brought soup for whom?

There's a bonus tip. If the tricky word is preceded by a preposition, it's “whom” because then it's necessarily part of the predicate (no matter where it lies in the sentence physically). Prepositions are words like at, for, by, to, with, from, under, and over. If your tricky word follows a preposition, it's automatically “whom.“

The book was written by whom?
From whom did you get that cookie?
With whom did you go to the theater?
You threw the eggs at whom?

Just look for the preposition.

Published Friday, February 13, 2004 12:16 PM by spiller

Comments

# @ Friday, February 13, 2004 7:07 PM

The tricky ones are like this: Give the ticket to whoever arrives first.

Anonymous

# @ Saturday, February 14, 2004 9:46 AM

Give the ticket to he who arrives first....

Anonymous

# @ Saturday, February 14, 2004 2:54 PM

Or to use programmer protocol: Give the ticket to (whoever arrives first) to clarify that "Whoever" is in the nominative and that it's the entire clause that's the object of the preposition. We had one at work a while back like this: [...] justifying my lapses to whoever my current editor happens to be. which introduces the extra complication that "whoever" is a predicate nominative, a situation that can sound awkward even when "correct" (the famous "It is I" vs. "It's me"). Melanie, perhaps [you could write] a future entry on the use of predicate nominative pronouns and the fuzzy rules that obtain in phrases like "It's me"?

Anonymous

# @ Monday, March 08, 2004 7:50 AM

Here is another tricky one (but I do not know if I made the correct choice): It is not always about whom you know at a party; sometimes it is about whom you should get to know.

Anonymous

# @ Thursday, June 03, 2004 9:12 PM

I am still a little confused. Is the sentence below correct? "I am told that Acard have appointed another Australian distributor, but could not tell you whom that might be."

Anonymous

# @ Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:36 PM

I'd like to know the reason for saying it before I learn how to say it.

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Wednesday, September 08, 2004 10:55 AM

a) We work with a number of experts who we can engage as needed.

b) We work with a number of experts whom we can engage as needed.

c) We work with a number of experts that we can engage as needed.

Any ideas?



Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:39 AM

sorry no ideas

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Sunday, October 09, 2005 3:09 PM

That does make it much easier to remember especially the Him -whom advice. Thanks that was really helpful and I bet I don't forget cuz its so easy to remember!

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Sunday, October 23, 2005 3:20 PM

does this make sense-----

Patriots, whomever they may be, must....

OR, is it

Patiots, whoever they may be, must....

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Friday, November 18, 2005 11:57 AM

"Give the ticket to him."
"Give the ticket to whomever."
"Give the ticket to whomever arrives first."

Isn't that what the rules are saying?

"Patriots must ...."
"Patriots, whomever they may be, must ...."

This is how I understood this.

Or on a smaller scale.

"They may be."
"They may be him."
"They may be whomever."
"Whomever they may be."









Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Tuesday, January 31, 2006 8:57 AM

Which do I use in this case:

Who do you know that is suffering from the following? vs. Whom do you know that is suffering from the following?

I believe it should be "who" not "whom" since I can rework the sentence as: "He is suffering from the following..."

whereas,

"Him/Her is suffering from the following..." just doesn't make sense.

Am I correct in my assumption?

Thanks for the input.

David

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Wednesday, February 01, 2006 1:40 PM

We are looking for your input on who/whom to invite to our client event.

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Friday, February 17, 2006 1:02 AM

I'm having the worst time with whoever/whomever in a copy editing class right now. The answer seems simple enough: whenever you need a subject, it's "whoever/who," when an object, "whomever/whom." The tricky part is when a phrase involving who/whom follows a preposition. I've learned that the phrase follows the preposition and becomes the object in its entiretiy, so that:

Give the ticket to him.
Give the ticket to (he who wants it).
Give the ticket to whoever wants it.

But I've been told that when the preposition is "for," it might be different:

Save the ticket for him.
Save the ticket for (him who wants it).
Save the ticket for whomever wants it.

The only reasoning I can see is that "him" sounds better with for, but I don't understand why. In my reading both phrases need a subject.

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Friday, February 17, 2006 1:16 AM

Just discovered this Web site: http://www.grammartips.homestead.com/case.html

Very involved stuff, and while I can see the difference in the two examples, I still can't quite wrap my head around the reasoning.

"Give the leftovers to (whoever wants them)."
"All things come to him (who waits)."

Something about a clause competing with a phrase, and the clause winning out? I'm clueless here. Would it be "Give the leftovers to him who wants them?" if it weren't a question of who (or whom)?

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Monday, April 17, 2006 12:05 PM

"I called her on the phone saying I was another kid who/whom I'd heard was her boyfriend."

I guess it's supposed to be "who" because "I'd heard he was her boyfriend" is what makes sense, not "him was her boyfriend."

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Tuesday, September 12, 2006 9:45 AM

What about "who made who?"

Or "who is labeling who in this argument?"

Anonymous

# re: Who Versus Whom @ Tuesday, September 19, 2006 2:16 PM

So, which is correct? "I would like to take the opportunity to congratulate Cherril and her team, whom received a team leadership award" OR "I would like to take the opportunity to congratulate Cherril and her team, who received a team leadership award" ?

Thank you.

Anonymous

# who vs whom @ Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:28 AM

PingBack from http://mckenzie.sexstoriesltd.com/whovswhom.html

who vs whom

Anonymous comments are disabled